Most African
countries could reach middle income status by 2025
Hardly a week goes by without an African
investors’ conference or growth summit. Portuguese professionals are looking
for opportunities in Angola. Silicon Valley companies are coming to Kenya to
learn about its homegrown ICT revolution. This is not an irrational fad.
Since
the turn of the century, Africa’s growth has been robust (averaging 5-6% GDP
growth a year), making important contributions to poverty reduction. The
current boom is underpinned by sound macro policies and political stability.
Unlike in some rich countries, public debt levels in most of Africa are
sustainable.
One way to track Africa’s progress is by charting the number of
countries that have achieved “middle income status”. In the World Bank’s
definition, you become a middle-income country (or “MIC”) when you cross the
US$1,000 GDP per capita threshold. To be sure, even at $1,000 per capita, many
of these countries still have high levels of poverty and poor human development
indicators. Gabon, at over $10,000 per capita income, has one of the
lowest immunization rates in Africa.
Nevertheless, reaching middle-income
status signifies membership in the same group as, say, Indonesia, Mexico and
China, which have access to global capital markets. It also signifies a level
of resources that can, in principle, be used to address the country’s
development needs.
How many MICs are there among sub-Saharan Africa’s 48 economies? We have
informally asked this question of 200 people (many pundits and professionals
among them). The standard answer is “around five”. Only one person got it right
and almost everyone is surprised to hear the result: Africa today is home to 22
MICs (23 if South Sudan is included)! Kenya, East Africa’s largest economy, is not among them (or
for that matter is any other East African Community member). In fact, if you
ranked all sub-Saharan African countries by per capita income, Kenya would be
right in the middle, ranked 24th out of 48.
If sub-Saharan Africa were one country it would already be a MIC with an
average per-capita income of around US$ 1,500. This average, however, masks
wide differences. Africa has mature economies, such as Botswana, Mauritius and South Africa; it is also home to fragile and
conflict-affected countries that are still struggling with entrenched poverty,
such as Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo or Guinea-Bissau. If current
trends continue, most African countries will have reached middle income status
by 2025. Only about 13 countries will remain low-income, most of them fragile
states.
Africa’s more advanced economies can be grouped into four, not mutually
exclusive, categories, of between six to eight countries:
First are mature MICs which include Botswana, Cape Verde, South Africa,
Mauritius, Namibia, Seychelles, and Swaziland, with some 60 million people.
These are Africa’s better-off economies, located in Southern Africa or
small-island states and come most naturally to mind when thinking about
Africa’s middle income countries. But their growth rates are actually lower,
especially in South Africa, Africa’s largest economy.
Second are commodity MICs. These are Angola, Congo (Brazzaville),
Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Ghana, Nigeria, Zambia, Sudan. These countries, which
are home to about 260 million people, are rich in natural resources, mainly oil.
By most social standards these countries remain very poor but they would have
sufficient resources to fight poverty successfully.
Third are new MICs which include Cameroon, Cote d’Ivoire, Djibouti,
Lesotho, Mauritania, Sao Tome & Principe, and Senegal. These countries
represent a broad mix of economies representing 60 million people. While
continuing to face major development challenges, most of the new MICs
benefitted from improved economic policies and Africa’s broader growth
momentum.
Forth are Africa’s next MICs. The following countries – home to 110
million people today – should reach middle income status by 2025 if past trends
continue or political interruptions subside: Chad, Kenya, Mozambique, Rwanda,
Sierra Leone, and Zimbabwe. With this group of new MICs more than half of
Africans would live in middle income economies and many other countries are
just behind, especially in Eastern Africa.
Reaching MIC status is not a goal in itself. Sustaining growth and
making it more pro-poor will be a tall order, as the experience of some of the
mature MICs shows. In order to grow at current rates, Africa needed to get a
few – albeit very important – things right, such as sound macro-management and
political stability. This allowed the continent to recover after two
unsuccessful decades.
To sustain growth, African countries will need to address
the challenges of structural transformation, employment, physical and human
capital deficits, all of which have their roots in governance. But if Africans
and African policymakers could correct the macroeconomic policy failures of the
past, they should, aided by a young population and the technological revolution
that is sweeping the continent, be able to overcome the remaining government
failures to experience sustained growth and poverty reduction in the future.
Shanta Devarajan is the chief economist for Africa
at the World Bank. Wolfgang Fengler is the World Bank’s lead economist in its
Nairobi office.
No comments:
Post a Comment